Сентябрь 2018

We continue keeping you informed on the results of our activities, and the IFC specialists’ take on the situation and the processes in global and regional economies. 
In September 2018, the value of assets of the WellMax investment portfolio increased by 1.14% in USD and EUR, which is equivalent to 14.57% per annum with monthly compounded interest. There was a 15.87% yield per annum in rubles and a 13.49% yield per annum in yuans with monthly compounded interest.
 
Over the last month, despite the lingering volatility in the world’s stock and commodity markets, the WellMax Premium portfolio also showed growth. Over the period from August 10th, 2018, to September 10th, 2018, the value of assets of this investment portfolio increased by 0.38% in USD.
 
 
The trade conflict between the world’s two largest economies remains the key factor determining the situation in global markets. Currently, the USA imposed a 25 percent tariff, worth a total of $50 billion US, which included $34 billion US on July 6th, and $16 billion US on August 23rd. In both cases, China responded with proportionate restrictive tariffs on US imports.    
It should be mentioned that it is the Chinese companies that have suffered greater losses so far. While the S&P 500 Broad Market Index gained 7.76% despite the high volatility over the period from January 1st, 2018, to September 14th, 2018, the SSE Composite Index plummeted by 19.91%, as can be seen on the chart below (source: Bloomberg).
Amidst the conflict escalation and a possible slowdown of both Chinese and global economies, the Shanghai Stock Exchange suffered a drop, followed by a corresponding decrease in the prices of industrial metals (copper & aluminum), as well as other metals widely used in industrial production (platinum, palladium, and silver). This is illustrated by the graph below (source: Bloomberg). 
 
 
At the same time, it should be mentioned that, while the conflict between the world’s two largest economies is escalating, and despite the slowed growth of Chinese exports, China’s trade surplus with the US hit a new record of $31.05 billion US, thus topping the previous record of $28.09 billion US in July, according to China’s Main Customs Authority. Given the fact that huge trade deficit with China was the main driver behind the US President’s Administration decision to impose the tariffs on China’s imports, an increase in trade deficit with China may force Donald Trump to resort to tougher measures in the trade conflict.
One of those measures may be the US imposing tariffs on imported goods from China, with the total value of $200 billion US, as per the list released on July 11th. The decision to slap the tariffs may be taken as soon as September, as reported by a number of US business papers. Besides, on September 7th, the US President threatened to impose additional tariffs on the top of those already imposed and announced, which are worth $267 billion US. 
Despite the evident risks for the global economy, which Trump’s protectionist policy may incur, it is highly unlikely that the USA and China will reach a viable trade agreement in the short term, as the US has been unable to achieve its goals under limited time conditions. What are these goals? What is the real underlying reason of the trade conflict between the USA, China, and the EU? What impact will it have on Russian and other developing markets? You can learn the answers from IFC CEO Alexey Trufanov’s lecture at the 59th International Basic Seminar presented by Good Life Consulting.
 
The ruble’s dynamics is taking the lead from the currencies of developing economies.
 
The increased pressure on the currencies of developing economies including Russian ruble has been one of the most noticeable economic trends over the last two months, which can be seen on the chart below (source: Bloomberg).
 
It should also be noted that both the weakening of the currencies of developing countries, and the main reason for it, had been forecast by us as early as 2017, and presented in our annual review:
 
The Russian ruble also experienced pressure from the last month’s outflow of funds from Russian securities in the run-up to the new US sanctions against Russia following the ‘Skripal case’.
It should also be mentioned that a sharp weakening of the ruble will result in Russia’s growing inflation, which, in turn, affected the Russia’s Central Bank’s monetary policy. One may recall that the Central Bank continuously decreased the base rate starting February 2015, lowering it from 17% in February 2015 to 7.25% in March 2018. However, in the last meeting, held on September 14th, the CB, with an eye out for the growing inflation trend, decided to increase the base rate by 0.25 pp. to 7.5%. It should be mentioned that the decision to increase the base rate will inevitably lead to higher interest rates on Russian ruble deposits, which will adversely affect the liquidity of Russia’s real estate market. 
 
The Turkish lira’s crash was one of the most noticeable events in the currency market over the last month, coming as a result of the escalating conflict between Turkey and the U.S. Due to the strong interconnection between Turkish and European economies, Turkey’s monetary crisis, in its turn, induced a significant weakening of the euro against the U.S. dollar in the mid-August of 2018. 
The Turkish-American conflict was triggered, first and foremost, by the imprisonment of American pastor Andrew Brunson, which has gone on since 2016. He had been accused of being involved in the 2016 attempted coup d’état. After several failed attempts by U.S. officials to have the U.S. citizen released from jail, in August, Donald Trump’s Administration decided to take on sanctions against Turkey. On August 1st, the U.S. Department of the Treasury imposed personal sanctions against two high-ranking Turkish officials: Abdulhamit Gül, the Minister of Justice, and Süleyman Soylu, the Minister of the Interior. Furthermore, on August 10th, Donald Trump announced the doubling of steel and aluminum import tariffs for Turkey, thus putting more pressure on the Turkish lira. Later, on August 16th, Steven Mnuchin, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, declared that the US might impose new sanctions against Turkey if the country does not release American pastor Andrew Brunson. 
The influence of the events in Turkey on the European currency’s exchange rate may be explained, in its turn, by investors’ concern that the Turkish monetary crisis might spread into the key member states of the Eurozone. It should be mentioned that European countries are not only Turkey’s key trade partner, but also one of its main creditors. Thus, if the Turkish monetary crisis turns into a full-fledged economic crisis, Europe’s banking system may be faced with the need to significantly re-evaluate, or even to write off the Turkish debt. Considering the weaknesses of banking systems in a number of European countries, this might result in grave liquidity problems for the EU, which was the reason of the euro’s strong downward trend, reaching 1.14 in the mid-August. 
At the same time, in the second half of August, the euro exchange rate quickly recovered losses and returned to the range of 1.16 – 1.17, following Donald Trump’s public criticism of Jerome Powell, the Chairman of the Fed, and his policy of raising the base rate. The euro is also helped by the U.S. significant inflation slowdown reported at the end of August 2018. In August, the U.S. base consumer price index grew by just 2.2% YoY, which is not only 0.2% less than the expectations of analysts, but is also lower than the July figure, as the U.S. Department of Labor reported. If the slowing trend of inflation continues in the U.S., the Fed may face questions regarding this year’s two increases of the base rate, which, in its turn, may put pressure on the U.S. dollar exchange rate. 
The upcoming midterm congressional elections in the U.S. are an additional source of pressure on the dollar, as their results are uncertain, and may not only entail changes to the representative body, but also to the U.S. domestic/international policies. Currently, the Republican Party is in control of both Chambers of the U.S. Congress. However, according to a number of experts, the November elections may result in the Republicans losing their majority in the House of Representatives. This, in turn, will impede Donald Trump’s ability to pass his initiatives through Congress. It should be mentioned that as of today the Republican Party is not likely to lose both of the Chambers of the Congress (which would enable the Democrats to initiate the impeachment procedure). However, at this point such a scenario cannot be excluded from consideration entirely. 
At the same time, the ongoing Fed’s balance sheet shrinkage and the related dollar liquidity withdrawal from the market (to which we made numerous references in our previous economic reviews) remain the key factor supporting the U.S. dollar. Since the beginning of the shrinkage, over the period from October 2017 to September 11th, 2018, the Fed has withdrawn about $250 billion US from the system. As the volume of shrinkage increases quarterly (starting from October, the Fed is going to raise the monthly volume of shrinkage to $50 billion US), by the end of the year the Fed is likely to have reduced the volume of dollar liquidity in the market by another $180 – 190 billion US. In its turn, the ECB proceeds with the quantitative easing, with monthly asset purchases of EUR30 billion, which will only be reduced to EUR15 billion in October.
As long as such a divergence is present in the policies of the two main central banks, the euro exchange rate will experience double pressure (strengthening of the dollar due to the balance sheet shrinkage and the growing base rate; weakening of the euro due to the ECB’s ongoing issuance).
Despite the escalation of the trade conflict between the U.S. and China and the related risks for the growth of global economy, last month oil showed a steady growth, closely approaching the psychologically important resistance level of $80 US/Brent barrel. 
The main reason of the rapid oil price hike in the second half of August was the conflict between the U.S. and Iran (which we referred to in our previous economic reviews), along with the resulting concerns by investors regarding the possibility of a spreading deficit in the oil market. 
On August 7th, the USA imposed the first round of sanctions against Iran. First and foremost, the sanctions are aimed at limiting gold and other metals trade with the country. The second round of sanctions, which is to forbid any fossil fuel transactions, as well as any transactions related to Iran’s central bank, is expected to come into force in the early November. At the same time, the document entails sanctions against companies and countries that will continue purchasing Iran’s oil after the sanctions against Iran have come into force. 
Due to this, the biggest importers of Iran’s oil decreased significantly their purchases over the last months:
    • China, the largest importer of oil from Iran, decreased its purchases by a quarter;
    • India, the second largest importer, decreased purchases by 36%; 
    • The EU halved their oil import from Iran;
    • South Korea (the third largest importer of Iran’s oil) ceased its purchases altogether.
Overall, in August, oil export from Iran amounted to mere 1.68 million bpd, which is 62% less than in May, when oil export from Iran hit a record high with 2.7 million bpd. Despite the significant decrease in purchases of Iranian oil, investors are concerned that other oil producers will not be able to substitute the remaining 1.7 million bpd by November. This, in turn, may result in an oil deficit and a growing price of oil. 
Over the last few weeks, statistics from the U.S. Department of Energy have also strengthened the oil price. First and foremost, this is to do with the data on the US stocks of crude oil. Over the period from August 10th to September 7th, those decreased by 18 million barrels, according to the Department of Energy, which is significantly higher than the market participants’ expectations of a 5-million-barrel decrease.
 
It should also be mentioned that the US oil production stopped growing and levelled off at 10.9 – 11 million bpd, which can be seen on the graph below.  
 
The main reason for the stagnating US oil production is the lack of pipeline capacity in oil producing regions. This is likely to slow down the growth of production in the second half of 2018, which is another factor pushing up the oil prices.
Overall, the current news trend of the oil market is positive, which is likely to allow the oil prices to level off at its current high rates in the short term, whereas the only two significant negative factors are the above-mentioned trade conflict between the US and China, and the negative changes in developing markets. However, the oil market continues to be highly volatile. The US hurricane season, which traditionally triggers sharp fluctuations of oil prices, also contributes to their volatility.
 
Considering the escalating trade conflict between the US and China, the Fed’s aggressive policy and the related volatility in developing markets, as well as the upcoming US congressional elections, we are about to enter an informationally rich and volatile period. A period of higher uncertainty, which will demand from the market participants to make rapid investment decisions, based on a deep and accurate analysis, i.e. the very competencies that have always been the strong suit of the International Financial Community team.
 
Yours faithfully,
IFC team
 
Поделиться:

Интересно?

© 2025 International Financial Community. Все права защищены.